I'd say it's a safe bet.
Right done that. I think on PS3 it suffers from being under saturated, on the 360 it suffers from being over saturated, either way throws a spanner into the realism. Frame rate is smoother on 360, although I think the whole 60/30 thing is over rated, both versions are excellent for frame rates.
Every time you see a feature in the 360 version it's in the PS3 version too. The water effect is the same on both, the light streaming through the rafters is the same on both. It's very samey.
What it is is sixaxis vs rumble. When you enter the house you fight a german in a scripted hand to hand combat. On the 360 you pump the left and right triggers, but on PS3 you rock your controller from side to side, that's much realer. But the controller shaking when a grenade hits on 360 is pretty real too.
I think 360 wins on this one for graphics. Over saturated 60 fps beats under saturated 30 fps, although I don't think anyone should really care as they both look great. Rumble vs sixaxis I'll take sixaxis. hopefully we can have both soon.
always a good unbiased post mate
my PSN name is smokey777
Originally posted julps31
The truth. MGS has aged gracefully. MGS1 = MILF
CoD and BiA are very good titles- MoH needs to catch up. but like others, I don't like WWII games. heck, I don't even like games set in the old days at all. everything feels primitive and retro. I didn't care for Resistance when they first showed it because I thought it was going to be another WWII game...until I saw aliens and futuristic weapons.
"With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion."
- Steven Weinberg
“If Jesus had been killed twenty years ago, Catholic school children would be wearing little electric chairs around their necks instead of crosses.”
- Lenny Bruce
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)