Quantcast
60 fps or 30 fps? (preemptive strike)
Page 1 of 16 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 309

Thread: 60 fps or 30 fps? (preemptive strike)

  1. #1

    60 fps or 30 fps? (preemptive strike)

    the war is heating up and the battle is raging on all fronts. as each new fact washes through the internet many apologists look to ever more oblique factors to dismis as unnecessary. 'Don't need Blu-ray, Don't need high definition... etc..' so whats the next denial on the list? Having watched a myriad of vids at E3 for all three consoles its safe to say that framerate will be the next. almost every 360 games seemed to judder on framerate, even the much anticipated GoW and Too Human. so do we need 60 frames a second? HELL YES!! this to me is going to be the main bone of contention come launch day. its becoming increasingly obvious that the PS3 can achieve more on screen at 60fps, but this is something that a still can never demonstrate, so expect a lot of comparisons of stills in the coming two years. keep your eye on bump mapping too. tell it as it is PS3 fans and don't let the opposition pull the wool over your eyes.

  2. #2
    after being exposed to 60 fps in a couple of classes, i really notice when a game or a video drops to 30 fps halo 3 was noticeable chugging when the covenant dropship came onscreen... disappointing, but what can you do eh?
    List of Shareable PSN purchases: Pixeljunk Monsters & Eden, Puzzlequest, Suikoden, Crash Bandicoot, Trials of Topaq, Operation Creature Feature, Crash Commando, Linger in Shadows, Flow, (US) LBP MGS4 map pack, Super Puzzle Fighter HD Remix, Calling all Cars, MkII, Wild Arms, more to come... PSN:RoberTo

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    California
    Age
    28
    Posts
    6,864
    Haha nice inspirational speech

    I heard that MGS4 runs at 30 fps...I have no way to verify that since 1UP said it and the guy didn't sound very technically apt, but that's kinda disappointing to hear. 60 FPS is certainly ideal for any game. I made a thread awhile back about whether or not framerate will ever stop being an issue though, and the general concensus was that as long as devs are pushing hardware like they should, we'll always have to worry about framerate drops

    Consider it a casualty of war, but it's still good to have....

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by KiLLA2006
    after being exposed to 60 fps in a couple of classes, i really notice when a game or a video drops to 30 fps halo 3 was noticeable chugging when the covenant dropship came onscreen... disappointing, but what can you do eh?
    what can we do? we can prevent devs from copping out by complaining about it on forums such as this. remember a lot of people in the industry trawl though sights like E-mpire for public opinion. so if your reading this devs 60fps please.

  5. #5
    I'd like to know why people seem to think it's as simple as a yes or no question to implement.
    Cell phones have changed mankind. Finally, men have something they can flip out and argue "mine is smaller than yours."

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by cpiasminc
    I'd like to know why people seem to think it's as simple as a yes or no question to implement.
    perhaps you could explain the complications to us mere mortals Cp. lol

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Cpi
    I'd like to know why people seem to think it's as simple as a yes or no question to implement.
    Because normal person doesn't want to admit limitations in any nextgen system. It's easier to admit that there are indeed limited resources in your hands if you have worked with any computational technology and system.

    Finding the sort of golden section in the complexity of any computer application is even today as important as it was many dozens of years ago.
    So many games so little time..

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by sct-i/on
    Because normal person doesn't want to admit limitations in any nextgen system.
    the point of this thread +rep. lets keep this forum Sony mods can't you change the rep system a bit, i have to spread them around it says again!!!!! i haven't repped sct in ages.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,266
    Cliff, I'm happy with just the idea of your agreement, no need for reputation

    It's just that I'm working on a programming/computer systems field myself so I know something about that particular side of life.

    And isn't my new avatar just adorable?
    So many games so little time..

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ourense, Spain
    Age
    30
    Posts
    24,710
    Quote Originally Posted by LiquidEagle
    I heard that MGS4 runs at 30 fps...I have no way to verify that since 1UP said it and the guy didn't sound very technically apt, but that's kinda disappointing to hear.
    Not only I don't consider 1UP's staff reliable anymore regading anything Playstation, but I'm not sure whether MGS4's frame rate is final just yet, although taking into account the slowdowns in the latest real time trailer, even though it's still an early build, they're probably aiming for 30fps even though I'd swear it ran at 60fps sometimes (can't tell for sure because the available videos are quite poorly encoded).

    Anyway, I hope this doesn't become a "The human eye can't tell the difference between 30 and 60" thread or a "J. Allard said he doesn't need a frame rate greater than movies', so nobody else wants more than that" thread.
    PSN ID: VGAficionado

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by sct-i/on
    Cliff, I'm happy with just the idea of your agreement, no need for reputation

    It's just that I'm working on a programming/computer systems field myself so I know something about that particular side of life.

    And isn't my new avatar just adorable?
    its a million miles from mine though lol

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Cliff
    its a million miles from mine though lol
    Life or avatar? Gerbil vs. Bum. You choose which is which :troutslap
    So many games so little time..

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by VG Aficionado

    Anyway, I hope this doesn't become a "The human eye can't tell the difference between 30 and 60" thread or a "J. Allard said he doesn't need a frame rate greater than movies', so nobody else wants more than that" thread.
    oh but it will VG, especially if 360 fans come on board or those that pretend to be unbiased (and we all know who they are)

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by sct-i/on
    Life or avatar? Gerbil vs. Bum. You choose which is which :troutslap
    never put gerbil and bums in the same sentence! you never know how many homophobics may read it lol

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Age
    41
    Posts
    6,697
    Quote Originally Posted by cliffbo
    never put gerbil and bums in the same sentence! you never know how many homophobics may read it lol
    lol
    my PSN name is smokey777
    Originally posted julps31
    The truth. MGS has aged gracefully. MGS1 = MILF

  16. #16
    film shows images at about 25fps and so thats the argument MS will use, but its a completely different thing from 60fps on consoles.

    Ah, but what of motion blur?

    When shooting film (is it that movie theaters are 24fps and television (59.96/2) fps?) at some N frames per second, each exposure captures all the positions the objects in view occupied during that exposure's 1/N second. For stationary objects, that doesn't mean anything interesting, but for objects in motion, it means they'll blur or streak in the film, so to speak.

    When rendering scenes, that doesn't happen (on any hardware I can afford, anyway). The individual frames of a real-time computer rendered image will calculate and display where the objects are at one infinitely thin slice in time. Think of it as the difference between living in a constantly lit world and one that's lit by a strobe light, and you've got the basic idea.

    Increasing FPS, in turn, ups the frequency of that strobe light. 24 or 30fps is fine for motion-blurred film images, but it takes more fps to compensate for the discrete timeslices of a rendered image.

  17. 60fps is best in games because it has to be responsive to the input of the user. A video can be passable at 15 fps, disney animations run at 30, the average is 24 (most anime clocks in at that), but games are a different story. 30 is good, but 60 is expected now. PSone could do 60 fps for crying out loud (but the graphics took a big hit, lol).
     
    There's a special kind of nerd though, who thinks computers will overtake mankind in thirty years, changing humanity in ways incomprehensible to us now, ignoring the third of the world without electricity. It gives spiritual significance to technology developed primarily for entertainment and warfare and gives nerds something to obsess over that isn't the crushing vacuousness of their lives.

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by LaLiLuLeLo2003
    60fps is best in games because it has to be responsive to the input of the user. A video can be passable at 15 fps, disney animations run at 30, the average is 24 (most anime clocks in at that), but games are a different story. 30 is good, but 60 is expected now. PSone could do 60 fps for crying out loud (but the graphics took a big hit, lol).
    i myself think that KK suggested that PS3 could do 120fps because by setting the bar higher it guarentees more games aiming at 60fps. but imagine if we do get games at 120fps! no doubt if MS do manage to survive long enough to bring out xbox3 and it runs at 120fps, then those saying 30fps is enough will change the record.

  19. now, I know 120 fps isn't perceivable by the human eye, and can't even be displayed by any television (this is a fact), so let's not even go there It's nice that such an approximation could be done, if only for giving designers room to work with, although I wonder if this is just hype talk.
     
    There's a special kind of nerd though, who thinks computers will overtake mankind in thirty years, changing humanity in ways incomprehensible to us now, ignoring the third of the world without electricity. It gives spiritual significance to technology developed primarily for entertainment and warfare and gives nerds something to obsess over that isn't the crushing vacuousness of their lives.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Age
    41
    Posts
    6,697
    im pretty sure v8s 2 was 60fps and i think v8s 3 is as well but they were ps2 games so it might be alot different with the pixel rate in ps3.
    my PSN name is smokey777
    Originally posted julps31
    The truth. MGS has aged gracefully. MGS1 = MILF

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

User Tag List

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •