Which console do you think rocked?
In my opinion it was the N64. If you look at the PS you will find a lot of good games and a lot, lot, lots of bad games. But the N64 had such a smaller amount of games that they were greater quality games than the PS. Can anyone post some statistics in sellings between these two cosoles
N64 brought so much to gaming. It was the first system to bring 3-d gameplay to the masses. It was so revolutionary when it launched. OOT and Mario 64 both set new bench marks for 3-d game play
ps1 brought gaming to the mainstream. It made video games "cool." Gran tuismo, Metal Gear Solid, FF7. Rpg's final became big after ff7 too.
Both were great systems in my opinion.
N64 > PS1
Quality over Quanity
I loved the 64 games conpared to the PS ones. Also the 4 controller ports it had.(You would think it would have 4 this time)
Proud 1993 JDM WRX owner!
N64 had Mario Kart/Tennis/Golf/Party, SSB, PD, Golden Eye, amoung others
PS had FF games, Street Fighter Alpha 3, GT 1+2, Metal Gear Solid amoung others.
So kinda even, although I got an N64 first...
May Peace Be With You
n64 - Oot and PD, fav games ever
WTF. PS1 was responsible for bringing gamin to the mainstream? Are you on crack? That is the biggist load of shit i have ever heard. THE NES BROUGHT IT 2 THE MAINSTREAM. Nintntendo was responsible for that feat. WAY BEFORE PS1s time.Originally Posted by The dude
Not at all. It was Sony that made videogames "cool" to play. Until then, it was still a geeky hobby for kids with no life. But PS1 had the CDs, the looks, the "cool" games and the "cool" advertising. 'twas Sony my friend.Originally Posted by aerofan113
But Nintendo did begin that process to a certain degree.
the sad yet true truth.Originally Posted by smellslikenintendospirit
May Peace Be With You
Quite simply, the PS2 would have never come to be if nintendo never turned its nose in the air to developers. Squaresoft actually encouraged companies to join the PS , whom badly needed the developer support at the time. There is a good chance that Nintendo would still have the 1# console/developer #s seat if it had not been stubborn with the adoption of larger capacity.
Nintendo was it's own undoing.
(READ: Nintendo still makes high quaility games, but would be 1# in the eys of the mass consumer and the hardcore if they made some diffrent decisions. It should have still been SEGA vs NINTENDO today. Too bad it never turned into SEGA + NINTENDO vs Everyone else.
We accepted the products of Science, but rejected its methods.
hmmm...then n64>ps, now....n64>ps. better games. the only reason i owned one was cus of my mod chip
There is no possible way it would have still been Sega vs. Nintendo. The moment the video game market reached the mass market, all the huge corporations would immediately turn their heads, looking for an investment. These big companies are big for a reason - they sense opportunity and then pursue it to death.Originally Posted by =NukeBlaze=
N64> (duh) PS1
Ya. Sure. And Nokia N-Gage is actually worth buying.Originally Posted by Dark_Cloud
gayOriginally Posted by Dark_Cloud
Never ask a man if he is from Texas. If he is, he will let you know. If he isnt, there is no point in embarassing him.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)