Should be up within the hour from IGN, GameSpot and TeamXbox (possibly 1UP, GameSpy and others). Update this thread when they roll in, homeboys.
Game Informer = 10/10
Official Xbox Magazine = 9.7/10
Electronic Gaming Monthly = 30/30
Famitsu = 34/40
Famitsu Xbox = 37/40
IGN = 9.8/10
GameSpot = 9.4/10
TeamXbox = 9.9/10
1Up = 10/10
GameSpy = 5/5
XBN = 10/10
XBN = 10/10
Game Reactor (Magazine) = 10/10
link: (warning, single player media) http://www.gamereactor.dk/texter/?id=58363
6/6 from a Norwegian site (warning, single player screenshot):
I don't know if these count, but...
OXM UK = 10/10, OXM Australia = 10/10
^your right. they don't count.
I expected thoses scores from GI and EGM. Did they even talk about anything cons about the game. It can't be 100% perfect
IGN = 9.8/10. Halo 2 got owned.
Damn the IGN servers must be getting hammered with a lot of traffic, none of the pages are loading for me. Great scores anyway.
9.4 for gamespot...damn...it didn't beat out the original there.
Yeah well the review is by Greg K., also known as "Captain Dipshit" to the videogame world.
GameSpy review is up:
Now that it's finally here, there's one final question: was it worth the wait? In a word, yes. In two words, hell yeah!
Well, every Cuby complained about the paper mario score...that's how stupid that way of thinking is...still though, I can't wait to get this game.
Well, considering Gamespot...9.4 was warranted by what they claimed, and, it was one of the only reviews to consider the fact that the single player aspect only takes 10 hours to complete...that's very, very short for any game genre. I was excited for this game, but wow, 10 hours? I get most of my multiplayer needs from Unreal Tournament 2004, which, I feel is vastly better in that regard. Unfortunately, the single player aspect was Halo 2's wild card, and it seems that they've focused too much on multiplayer this time around.Originally Posted by Adam
And I quote Xbox nation in: "It's not perfect," but let's give it a 10/10 anyway.
thats the thing, Halo's singleplayer was very easy to beat and didn't take that much effort. Halo's has been runnin off of multiplayer hype
They also said that the more experienced Halo players that they might as well just jump to the more difficult settings. Thats just sad
Sad, in what way? It should be that way for experienced players in any franchise.
And this my friends, is why Metal Arms shall be eternally better than halo/2 in every way. Except for AI. Oh and Halo has online.
That's quite true, and, Xbox Nation definetely agrees with you. Apparently, they're operating on that new Spinal Tap philosophy - can't wait for the amps and reviews that go to 11.Originally Posted by OutlawAdidas
Point is, if the game isn't perfect, it doesn't deserve a 10. Period.
ARe you joking me....9.8 is a good score!Originally Posted by Adam
How can GameSpot give Halo 2 a lower score than Halo 1? I haven't played it, and I guess it's possible, but judging from all the damn improvements...and online play, lol...seems odd.
"All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us." - J.R.R. Tolkien
Halo 1 Review = Joe Fielder
Halo 2 Review = Greg Kasavin
so wait a moment........Halo 2 got a 9.8, GTA SA got a 9.9, Killzone got 7.5, sooo one game left.....Metroid Prime 2. A game to defy expectations. Ohhhh I'm just jumpin for joy!!!
EuroGamer = 9/10
1UP = 10/10
Well, I have been playing it for the past two days thanks to an unnamed source and I can say it is amazing...too bad I had to return it back to him today.
It got owned because SA got a 9.9. I thought for one reason MP was beter than Halo, because of single player. After listening to the 17 min. Gamespot video review, it sounds like Bungie didnt improve the single player very muchOriginally Posted by Hylian-Advocate
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)