............... ANYWAYS!
Lotsie, it is alllllll talk untill you can back up what you are saying. But you are right.
lol. Lotsie, while you may think that the GCN has no competition, I'm afraid that you're very wrong. Tons of people like the PS2 and the X-Box. And it just wouldn't be gaming without competition. I mean, I'm not very good with Economics(yet. I'm taking a class in it) but I'm pretty sure that rival systems actually help the gaming market. What would the gaming market be like with only Nintendo? Just think about it.Originally posted by Temjin
............... ANYWAYS!
I dont like these newbies. theyre all talk.
Give em' time, they'll mature. We all started off like that.Originally posted by The1lone2outlaw3
I dont like these newbies. theyre all talk.
If it was only Nintendo, innovation would be stifled, and we probably wouldn't have gotten any of the kickass games we've enjoyed from Nintendo over the past couple of years. Competition forces developers to create new, innovative games that keep this industry fresh. If Nintendo was the only videogame company around, they wouldn't feel the need to give us something new every now and then. They could just keep feeding us rehashes of the very first Super Mario Brothers game.Originally posted by LotsieLovesU
if it was only nintendo, it would be great!!! EVERYONE would see the light!!!![]()
Temjin is actually perfectly correct you know. Competition is actually one of the best things for a company(besides money:gg). I mean, have you noticed that with every war a new powerful weapon is created(Machine Gun, Atom Bomb.......). It's all because they have to innovate and create new stuff, or they will be beaten. If there was only one of every type of company in the world, then we would not be getting new stuff, just variations of the old stuff like Temjin said. Think about it.Originally posted by LotsieLovesU
what ever!
If nintendo were the only cmopany it would crumble and fall do to its weak game innovation. But with greystation and and X bug around it has quite a valid threat to it's profit there fore i believe that if sony and nintendo merged they would be superior to microsoft and yet still have competition plus whats the point in have company unless it sels products that are in demand if nintendo were the on ly company it would not be forced by competiton but by PROFIT no-one would buy repeats of smb because they would want better games.
so
competition->innovation->expansion->force of competitions innovation->more competiton->innovation->expansion
etc etc etc etc etc etc
do you get my point it will never end til they merge
merger->domination->excellent porducts
note: ne 1 who calls me a newbie maybe damned to the most hated part of my dark abyss (the ignorant moron section)
Wow you are cool.Originally posted by abysskeeper
X bug
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks