PDA

View Full Version : Some new "Mobile Suit Gundam: Crossfire" pics



Crossbar
10-09-2006, 01:16 AM
I think I haven't seen these pictures before. The first pic looks almost cg to me. :)

http://playstation3.gaming-universe.de//screengalerie/1863.jpg
http://playstation3.gaming-universe.de//screengalerie/1862.jpg
http://playstation3.gaming-universe.de//screengalerie/1861.jpg
http://playstation3.gaming-universe.de//screengalerie/1860.jpg
http://playstation3.gaming-universe.de//screengalerie/1859.jpg
http://playstation3.gaming-universe.de//screengalerie/1858.jpg
http://playstation3.gaming-universe.de//screengalerie/1857.jpg
http://playstation3.gaming-universe.de//screengalerie/1856.jpg
http://playstation3.gaming-universe.de//screengalerie/1855.jpg

LiquidEagle
10-09-2006, 01:20 AM
mm, cool. I hope that second picture isn't a sign of what kind of draw distance this game will have :( That mesa in the distance almost looks like it's fogged out or something :-/

Raijin
10-09-2006, 02:42 AM
Damn, Gundam is just, so not for me I guess. :D
Anyway, I would to see it in movement.

EvilTaru
10-09-2006, 03:02 AM
I really hope this plays well because there needs to be at least one good gundam game on the PS3, come on Bandai, you can do it!!!

curryking1
10-09-2006, 05:10 AM
The graphics are excellent. The only comparisons are like AC4 and Chromehounds, and this absolutely destroys Chromehounds, haven't seen good enough quality of AC4 yet though so can't compare those two.

Ya, hopefully Bandai can actually make a good game out of Gundam lol!

Kabbage
10-09-2006, 05:25 AM
It looks good. The Gameplay Videos...look bad.

agentorange
10-09-2006, 06:12 AM
the 1st pic is CGI

luca29
10-09-2006, 06:30 AM
the 1st pic is CGI

bandai it has said that the game does not have cg :)

8_Bit
10-09-2006, 08:01 AM
I heard someone on a TGS podcast saying it had really nice graphics, (not Motorstorm-level, but very pretty graphics anyway) but looked slow as hell (not in framerate, but in gameplay, I believe the word "plodding" was used) kinda like Chromehounds on the 360.

As someone who spent hours and hours really trying to like Chromehounds, but ultimately being bored nearly to death with it's gameplay, this doesn't sound promising to me.

Armored Core looks much more exciting, faster, and better to me, but Armored Core preview videos in the past have always tended to look faster and more exciting than they actually turn out to be too, so I don't have much optimism for giant robots right now. That sucks, because I'd really like a giant robot game that is actually fun to play.

ZOE: 3rd Runner might be our last best hope for the genre, but who knows if it will ever happen?

Viano
10-09-2006, 08:40 AM
I heard someone on a TGS podcast saying it had really nice graphics, (not Motorstorm-level, but very pretty graphics anyway) but looked slow as hell (not in framerate, but in gameplay, I believe the word "plodding" was used) kinda like Chromehounds on the 360.

As someone who spent hours and hours really trying to like Chromehounds, but ultimately being bored nearly to death with it's gameplay, this doesn't sound promising to me.

Armored Core looks much more exciting, faster, and better to me, but Armored Core preview videos in the past have always tended to look faster and more exciting than they actually turn out to be too, so I don't have much optimism for giant robots right now. That sucks, because I'd really like a giant robot game that is actually fun to play.

ZOE: 3rd Runner might be our last best hope for the genre, but who knows if it will ever happen?

http://www.baysidevideoproductions.com/tgs/ac4.MPG
gameplay demo, if this doesn't excite you I don't know what else can loL

http://forums.e-mpire.com/showthread.php?t=62269
other cam videos


the 1st pic is CGI
Everything is CGI

lips
10-09-2006, 11:27 PM
nice, but could use more pink smoke and orange or blue lasers.

LaLiLuLeLo
10-09-2006, 11:30 PM
there's no cg in the game, the director said that there's no need for it.

curryking1
10-09-2006, 11:52 PM
The first pic is CGI? Damn, lol, looks pretty bad for not realtime stuff lol. If any pic I should call CGI on it would be the seventh picture with the trees lol. That first pic is hardly the best in the bunch, the close ups of the building give and ground don't show super amazing textures, but they're far from bad, very good looking for a game that will probably be on pretty massive scale with destroyable buildings.

But ya, the games has nice graphics... but... uhh let's wait for the other elements to be displayed haha.

Holy crap.... destructable and destructeable are both not words according to Firefox 2.0 candidates.... i had no idea haha.

LaLiLuLeLo
10-09-2006, 11:56 PM
I'm gonna wait on a few reviews before I pick this one up.

PUNK em 733
10-10-2006, 01:27 AM
Well IMHO the graphics on the mechs, and all are nice because there is absolutley no detail in the environments. Hopefully they jack up the detail before it ships.

MegaCot
10-10-2006, 01:32 AM
Armored Core 4 kills this.

Viano
10-10-2006, 07:02 AM
Armored Core 4 kills this.

you're talking about two different things

indiekid4
10-10-2006, 04:00 PM
the environments are pretty bland...hmm, not sold on this game.....yet

Fazares
10-11-2006, 01:33 AM
looks pretty good to me...

yoshaw
10-27-2006, 05:55 AM
New screenshots updated on OCT24th and OCT26th

http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2006/298/928385_20061026_screen001.jpg
http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2006/296/reviews/928385_20061024_screen008.jpg

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/sim/gundamworld/screenindex.html

curryking1
10-27-2006, 06:11 AM
There is a trailer at Gamespot, the draw distance and the trees look insanely cool.

It's the Oct. 19 one.

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/sim/gundamworld/media.html

chrismt
11-15-2006, 02:43 AM
Here's another one.

http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/3782/phpthumbphpyz2.jpg